Writing to a volatile field has the same memory effect as a monitor release,and reading from a volatile field has the same memory effect as a monitor acquire.

和

Effectively,the semantics of volatile have been strengthened substantially,almost to the level of synchronization. Each read or write of a volatile field acts like “half” a synchronization,for purposes of visibility.

从here.

这是否意味着,对volatile变量的任何写入都会使执行线程将其缓存刷新到主内存中,并且每次从volatile字段读取都会使线程从主内存重新读取其变量？

我问,因为同一文本包含此声明

Important Note: Note that it is important for both threads to access the same volatile variable in order to properly set up the happens-before relationship. It is not the case that everything visible to thread A when it writes volatile field f becomes visible to thread B after it reads volatile field g. The release and acquire have to “match” (i.e.,be performed on the same volatile field) to have the right semantics.

这句话让我很困惑.我知道对于使用synchronized语句定期获取和释放不是这样 – 如果某个线程释放任何监视器,那么它所做的所有更改都会明显地变为所有其他线程(更新：实际上不是真的 – 请注意最佳答案). stackoverflow上甚至有一个question about it.然而据说无论出于何种原因,情况并非如此.我无法想象发生在事先保证的任何实现,它不会使其他线程看到更改,这些线程不会读取相同的volatile变量.至少想象一个实现,它与前两个引号并不矛盾.

此外,在发布这个问题之前,我做了一些研究,例如this article,其中包含这个句子

After executing these instructions,all writes are visible to all other threads through cache subsystem or main memory.

提到的指令是在写入易失性字段时发生的指令.

那么这个重要的音符应该是什么意思？或者我错过了什么？或许这个说明完全错了？

回答？

在进行了一些更多的研究之后,我只能在官方文档中找到关于volatile字段及其对非易失性字段更改的影响的声明：

Using volatile variables reduces the risk of memory consistency errors,because any write to a volatile variable establishes a happens-before relationship with subsequent reads of that same variable. This means that changes to a volatile variable are always visible to other threads. What’s more,it also means that when a thread reads a volatile variable,it sees not just the latest change to the volatile,but also the side effects of the code that led up the change.

从here.

我不知道这是否足以得出结论,这种情况发生在关系只保证读取相同的volatile的线程之前.所以现在我只能总结一下结果是不确定的.

但实际上,我建议考虑线程A在写入易失性字段时所做的更改,只有当线程B读取相同的volatile字段时才能保证线程B可见.官方消息来源的上述引用强烈暗示.