参见英文答案 >
String concatenation: concat() vs “+” operator11
我做的一些代码比较了将字符串连接到“string”“string”所花费的时间:
我做的一些代码比较了将字符串连接到“string”“string”所花费的时间:
for(int i = 0; i < 100000000L; i++) { String str2 = str + str; }
到“string”.concat(“string”):
for(int i = 0; i < 100000000L; i++) { String str2 = str.concat(str); }
其中str ==“string”.
我得到的输出与此一致,尽管平均差异通常更接近于61纳秒:
String str2 = str + str
: 118.57349468 nanoseconds
String str2 = str.concat(str)
: 52.36809985 nanoseconds
.concat
is faster than+
by 66.20539483 nanoseconds
这表明即使循环和赋值到一个新的字符串,.concat比二分之二更快.当我使用一个更长的字符串(str ==“这是非常长的真正非常长的字符串”),它的速度比三分之一快.这是特别奇怪的,因为如果.concat更快,不应该编译成.concat?
我的主要问题是:为什么.concat更快?
完整的代码,以防您想要运行它并进行实验:
public class TimeCompare { public static void main(String[] args) { final long times = 100000000L; String str = "String"; long start1 = System.nanoTime(); for(int i = 0; i < times; i++) { String str2 = str + str; } long end1 = System.nanoTime(); long time1 = end1 - start1; System.out.println((double)(time1) / times); System.out.println(); long start2 = System.nanoTime(); for(int i = 0; i < times; i++) { String str2 = str.concat(str); } long end2 = System.nanoTime(); long time2 = end2 - start2; System.out.println((double)(time2) / times); System.out.println(); System.out.println(".concat is faster than \"+\" by " + ((double)(time1 - time2) / times) + " nanoseconds"); } }
解决方法
以下是concat的源代码:
public String concat(String str) { int otherLen = str.length(); if (otherLen == 0) { return this; } int len = value.length; char buf[] = Arrays.copyOf(value,len + otherLen); str.getChars(buf,len); return new String(buf,true); }
“string”“string”编译为新的StringBuilder().append(“string”).append(“string”).toString().1 append的源代码使用其超类’,AbstractStringBuilder,
public AbstractStringBuilder append(String str) { if (str == null) str = "null"; int len = str.length(); ensureCapacityInternal(count + len); str.getChars(0,len,value,count); count += len; return this; }
/////////////////concat int otherLen = str.length(); if (otherLen == 0) { return this; } int len = value.length; char buf[] = ((Object)value.getClass() == (Object)Object[].class) ? (T[]) new Object[len + otherLen] : (T[]) Array.newInstance(value.getClass().getComponentType(),len + otherLen); System.arraycopy(value,buf,Math.min(value.length,len + otherLen)); System.arraycopy(str.value,str.value.length); return new String(buf,true); ///////////////append if (str == null) str = "null"; int len = str.length(); if (value.length + len - value.length > 0) { int newCapacity = value.length * 2 + 2; if (newCapacity - value.length + len < 0) newCapacity = value.length + len; if (newCapacity < 0) { if (value.length + len < 0) // overflow throw new OutOfMemoryError(); newCapacity = Integer.MAX_VALUE; } value = ((Object)value.getClass() == (Object)Object[].class) ? (T[]) new Object[newCapacity] : (T[]) Array.newInstance(value.getClass().getComponentType(),newCapacity); System.arraycopy(value,(value.length <= newCapacity) ? value.length : newCapacity; } if (0 < 0) { throw new StringIndexOutOfBoundsException(0); } if (len > str.value.length) { throw new StringIndexOutOfBoundsException(len); } if (0 > len) { throw new StringIndexOutOfBoundsException(len - 0); } System.arraycopy(str.value,value.length,len - 0); count += len; return this;
删除不会使用给定字符串执行的代码,并删除它们之间相同的代码:
//////////////concat int len = value.length; len + otherLen System.arraycopy(value,len + otherLen)); System.arraycopy(str.value,str.value.length); this.value = value; /////////////////append if(value.length + len - value.length > 0) int newCapacity = value.length * 2 + 2; if(newCapacity - value.length + len < 0) if(newCapacity < 0) System.arraycopy(value,(value.length <= newCapacity) ? value.length : newCapacity); if(0 < 0) if(len > str.value.length) if(0 > len) System.arraycopy(str.value,len - 0); count += len;
在计算所有操作和删除concat和append之间相同的操作之后:
concat -------- int assignment: 0 int +/-: 0 int comparison: 0 char[] assignment: 1 arraycopy: 0 int *: 0 append -------- int assignment: 1 int +/-: 5 int comparison: 6 char[] assignment: 0 arraycopy: 0 int *: 1
您可以看到,在几乎所有情况下,一个concat都将比一个附加更快,并编译为两个追加和一个toString.