c# – 设置Parallel.For循环的优先级

前端之家收集整理的这篇文章主要介绍了c# – 设置Parallel.For循环的优先级前端之家小编觉得挺不错的,现在分享给大家,也给大家做个参考。
好的,情况如下:我的主要/ UI线程(称之为Thread1)用于从phsycial文档扫描程序中获取一批图像.获取批次后,会启动一个单独的“后台”线程(称为Thread2)来处理并保存该批次中的图像.

Thread2(“后台”线程)使用Parallel.For循环,与正常For循环相比,可将图像处理/保存时间缩短70%.但是,它似乎也是最大化我的所有处理器,因此Thread1无法开始获取任何更多的图像,直到Parallel.For循环完成.

有没有办法“限制”一个Parallel.For循环,以便它不会最大化我的处理器?或者设置处理优先级?我尝试设置Thread2.Priority = ThreadPriority.Lowest,但这似乎不会影响循环.或者我误解了Parallel.For循环是如何工作的?是以某种方式阻止Thread1?

这是我如何从Thread1中的方法调用Thread2.

public void SaveWithSettings(bool save) // method in Thread1
{
    ....
    Thread thr = new Thread(ThreadWork); // creating new thread (Thread 2)
    thr.Priority = ThreadPriority.Lowest; // does nothing?
    thr.Start(new SaveContainer(sc)); // pass a copy as paramater

    // misc stuff to make scanning possible again
    numBgw++;
    twain.RemoveAllImages(); // clear images
    imagelist.Clear(); // clear imagelist images
    .... // etc. this all appears to process fine while Thread2 is processing
}

这是我的ThreadWork方法

private void ThreadWork(object data) // executing in Thread2
{
    SaveContainer sc = data as SaveContainer; // holds images

    bool[] blankIndex = new bool[sc.imagelist.Count]; // to use in Parallel.For loop
    for (int i = 0; i < sc.imagelist.Count; i++)
        blankIndex[i] = false; // set default value to false (not blank)

    Parallel.For(0,sc.imagelist.Count,i => // loop to mark blank images
    {
        bool x = false; // local vars make loop more efficient
        x = sc.IsBlankImage((short)i); // check if image at index i is blank
        blankIndex[i] = x; // set if image is blank
    }
    .... // other image processing steps
}

解决方法

public static void PriorityParallelForeach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source,Action<T> action,ThreadPriority threadPriority,int? maxDegreeOfParallelism = null)
   {
       if (maxDegreeOfParallelism == null || maxDegreeOfParallelism<1)
       {
           maxDegreeOfParallelism = Environment.ProcessorCount;
       }

       var blockingQueue = new BlockingCollection<T>(new ConcurrentQueue<T>(source));
       blockingQueue.CompleteAdding();

        var tasks = new List<Task>() ;

        for (int i = 0; i < maxDegreeOfParallelism; i++)
        {
            tasks.Add(Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
             {
                 while (!blockingQueue.IsCompleted)
                 {
                     T item;
                     try
                     {
                         item = blockingQueue.Take();
                     }
                     catch (InvalidOperationException)
                     {
                         // collection was already empty
                         break;
                     }

                     action(item);
                 }
             },CancellationToken.None,TaskCreationOptions.None,new PriorityScheduler(threadPriority)));
        }

        Task.WaitAll(tasks.ToArray());

   }

要不就:

Parallel.ForEach(testList,item =>
            {

                var privIoUsePrio = Thread.CurrentThread.Priority;
                // Set your desired priority
                Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.Lowest;

                TestCalc(item);

                //Reset privIoUse priority of the TPL Thread
                Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = privIoUsePrio;
            });
原文链接:https://www.f2er.com/csharp/239125.html

猜你在找的C#相关文章