对于win32可执行文件(x86),我们可以设置LargeAddressAware标志,以便在x64
Windows上运行时可以访问4 GB(而不是2 GB)的虚拟地址空间.
这看起来非常吸引人.但是,存在风险.
例如,请参阅: Drawbacks of using /LARGEADDRESSAWARE for 32 bit Windows executables?
这看起来非常吸引人.但是,存在风险.
例如,请参阅: Drawbacks of using /LARGEADDRESSAWARE for 32 bit Windows executables?
因此,让我们继续配置正在执行某些单元测试的系统,系统范围的注册表开关AllocationPreference设置为MEM_TOP_DOWN.
应该这样做,不应该吗?
它没有!
问题是Visual Studio的x86“测试运行器”(执行引擎)本身没有启用LAA.
这个父进程只能看到“较低”的2 GB VAS,我们的模块也将被测试.
VS2013.1中的示例
> mstest.exe生成QTAgent32.exe
> vstest.console.exe生成vstest.executionengine.x86.exe
所有这些都没有启用LAA!
这是一个用于检查LAA执行环境的小代码片段(VS单元测试,csharp).
除非它成功,否则您的测试环境不适合让您的单元测试(也)覆盖与LAA的兼容性:
using System; using System.Diagnostics; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting; namespace TestCheckEnv32LAA { [TestClass] public class CheckEnv32LAA { #region [Native DLL import] [Flags()] public enum AllocationType : uint { COMMIT = 0x1000,RESERVE = 0x2000,RESET = 0x80000,LARGE_PAGES = 0x20000000,PHYSICAL = 0x400000,TOP_DOWN = 0x100000,WRITE_WATCH = 0x200000 } [Flags()] public enum MemoryProtection : uint { EXECUTE = 0x10,EXECUTE_READ = 0x20,EXECUTE_READWRITE = 0x40,EXECUTE_WRITECOPY = 0x80,NOACCESS = 0x01,READONLY = 0x02,READWRITE = 0x04,WRITECOPY = 0x08,GUARD_Modifierflag = 0x100,NOCACHE_Modifierflag = 0x200,WRITECOMBINE_Modifierflag = 0x400 } [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] struct MEMORYSTATUSEX { public uint dwLength; public uint dwMemoryLoad; public ulong ullTotalPhys; public ulong ullAvailPhys; public ulong ullTotalPageFile; public ulong ullAvailPageFile; public ulong ullTotalVirtual; public ulong ullAvailVirtual; public ulong ullAvailExtendedVirtual; } [DllImport("kernel32.dll")] extern static void GlobalMemoryStatusEx(ref MEMORYSTATUSEX status); [DllImport("kernel32.dll",SetLastError = true)] public static extern UIntPtr VirtualAlloc(UIntPtr lpAddress,UIntPtr dwSize,AllocationType flAllocationType,MemoryProtection flProtect); #endregion public CheckEnv32LAA() { } [TestMethod] public void CheckEnvironment32LAA() { // check for a suitable environment to test modules for compatibility with LargeAddressAware (LAA): // 1) OS must be x64 // 2) test runner must be x86 // 3) test runner must be LAA enabled itself // 4) memory allocation (with manual TopDown flag) must happen beyond the 2 GB boundary // 5) memory allocation (with default settings) must happen beyond the 2 GB boundary // // RE 3) this requirement is true for "regular" unit tests (to test DLL modules). it does not apply // for any tests spawning the application (EXE) to be tested as a separate process. // // RE 5) a failure indicates the following registry switch has not been set: // [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management] // "AllocationPreference"=dword:00100000 // // see: // https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2288728/ String sParentProcName = Process.GetCurrentProcess().MainModule.FileName; //CHECK_1 Assert.IsTrue(Environment.Is64BitOperatingSystem,"Test is not executing on x64 OS"); //CHECK_2 Assert.IsFalse(Environment.Is64BitProcess,"Test runner is not x86: " + sParentProcName); //CHECK_3 MEMORYSTATUSEX tmpStatus = new MEMORYSTATUSEX(); tmpStatus.dwLength = (uint)Marshal.SizeOf(typeof(MEMORYSTATUSEX)); tmpStatus.ullTotalPhys = 0; GlobalMemoryStatusEx(ref tmpStatus); ulong uVM = tmpStatus.ullTotalVirtual; Assert.IsTrue(uVM > 0x80000000,"Test runner is not LAA enabled (max: " + uVM / (1024 * 1024) + "): " + sParentProcName); Assert.IsTrue(uVM <= 0x100000000,"Test runner is not x86 (max: " + uVM / (1024 * 1024) + "): " + sParentProcName); //CHECK_4 UIntPtr pMem = UIntPtr.Zero; ulong uAddress = 0; pMem = VirtualAlloc(UIntPtr.Zero,(UIntPtr)1024,AllocationType.RESERVE | AllocationType.TOP_DOWN,MemoryProtection.READWRITE); uAddress = (ulong)pMem; Assert.IsTrue(uAddress > 0x80000000,"Test runner is not LAA enabled (highest: " + uAddress / (1024 * 1024) + "): " + sParentProcName); //CHECK_5 pMem = VirtualAlloc(UIntPtr.Zero,AllocationType.RESERVE,"System-wide MEM_TOP_DOWN is not set (allocated at: " + uAddress / (1024 * 1024) + ")"); } } }
到目前为止,我只是遇到了混淆问题中列出的Microsoft二进制文件的建议(即使用editbin.exe手动“修补”它们).但这有以下缺点:
原文链接:https://www.f2er.com/windows/364505.html>为Visual Studio安装任何未来的Service Pack后,我需要重复修补
>我不能再并行测试:“常规”x86和“扩展”x86与LAA
似乎一个适当的长期解决方案必须由微软实施?:
http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/196039-microsoft-test-tools/suggestions/5781437