当参数化类继承自符合Equatable的另一个类时,==调用超类的==.任何人都可以解释为什么会发生这种情况和/或我在这里做错了什么？我相信一个最好的例子说明了我的问题：
public class Foo: Equatable {}
public func ==(lhs: Foo,rhs: Foo) -> Bool { return false }
//Parametrized
public class Bar<T: Equatable>: Foo {
public var bar: T?
public init(barIn: T?) {
self.bar = barIn
}
}
public func ==<T>(lhs: Bar<T>,rhs: Bar<T>) -> Bool { return lhs.bar == rhs.bar }
//Non parametrized
public class Baz: Foo {
public var baz: Int?
public init(bazIn: Int?) {
self.baz = bazIn
}
}
public func ==(lhs: Baz,rhs: Baz) -> Bool { return lhs.baz == rhs.baz }
//Parametrized,no inheritance
public class Qux<T: Equatable>: Equatable {
public var qux: T?
public init(quxIn: T?) {
self.qux = quxIn
}
}
public func ==<T>(lhs: Qux<T>,rhs: Qux<T>) -> Bool { return lhs.qux == rhs.qux }
Bar<Int>(barIn: 1) == Bar<Int>(barIn: 1) //false
Baz(bazIn: 1) == Baz(bazIn: 1) //true
Qux(quxIn: 1) == Qux(quxIn: 1) //true,of course
虽然我没有在Swift参考文献中找到任何关于此的内容,this gives us a clue：
原文链接：https://www.f2er.com/swift/319052.htmlGenerics are lower down the pecking order. Remember,Swift likes to be as “specific” as possible,and generics are less specific. Functions with non-generic arguments (even ones that are protocols) are always preferred over generic ones:
但这似乎与Equatable没有任何关系;此测试向我们显示了相同的行为：
class Foo {};
class Bar<T>: Foo {};
class Baz: Bar<Int> {};
class Qux<T>: Baz {};
func test(foo: Foo) {
print("Foo version!");
};
func test<T>(bar: Bar<T>) {
print("Bar version!");
};
func test(baz: Baz) {
print("Baz version!");
};
func test<T>(qux: Qux<T>) {
print("Qux version!");
};
let foo = Foo();
let bar = Bar<Int>();
let baz = Baz();
let baz2: Bar<Int> = Baz();
let qux = Qux<Float>();
test(foo); // Foo
test(bar); // Foo
test(baz); // Baz
test(baz2); // Foo
test(qux); // Baz
所以这里发生的是当选择一个自由函数,同时使用它的静态类型而不是动态类型时,Swift不喜欢使用任何泛型,即使该泛型是一个类型参数,它确实应该是最专业的选择.
因此,似乎要解决这个问题,正如@VMAtm所建议的那样,你应该在类中添加一个像equalTo这样的方法,以便在运行时获取实际的方法.
