Oracle 11g肯定提高了CLOB的可用性,使大多数字符串函数重载,因此它们现在可以与CLOB本机一起工作.
ORA-22828: input pattern or replacement parameters exceed 32K size limit 22828. 00000 - "input pattern or replacement parameters exceed 32K size limit" *Cause: Value provided for the pattern or replacement string in the form of VARCHAR2 or CLOB for LOB sql functions exceeded the 32K size limit. *Action: Use a shorter pattern or process a long pattern string in multiple passes.
仅当要替换的第三个参数是具有超过32k字符的CLOB时才会发生这种情况.
(Oracle Database 11g企业版11.2.0.3.0版 – 64位生产)
测试用例:
declare v2 varchar2(32767); cl_small clob; cl_big clob; cl_big2 clob; begin v2 := rpad('x',32767,'x'); dbms_output.put_line('v2:' || length(v2)); cl_small := v2; dbms_output.put_line('cl_small:' || length(cl_small)); cl_big := v2 || 'y' || v2; dbms_output.put_line('cl_big[1]:' || length(cl_big)); cl_big2 := replace(cl_big,'y',cl_small); dbms_output.put_line('cl_big[2]:' || length(cl_big2)); cl_big2 := replace(cl_big,cl_big); dbms_output.put_line('cl_big[3]:' || length(cl_big2)); end; /
结果:
v2:32767 cl_small:32767 cl_big[1]:65535 cl_big[2]:98301 ORA-22828: input pattern or replacement parameters exceed 32K size limit
这似乎与暗示替换字符串可能是CLOB的文档不一致 – 我认为这应该意味着任何CLOB都将被允许,而不仅仅是那些恰好是< 32K:http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e41084/functions153.htm#SQLRF00697
这是一个功能粗略的初稿,它将在某些限制下完成工作,但尚未经过很好的测试:
function replace_with_clob (i_source in clob,i_search in varchar2,i_replace in clob ) return clob is l_pos pls_integer; begin l_pos := instr(i_source,i_search); if l_pos > 0 then return substr(i_source,1,l_pos-1) || i_replace || substr(i_source,l_pos+length(i_search)); end if; return i_source; end replace_with_clob;
它只对搜索词的第一个实例进行单个替换.
declare v2 varchar2(32767); cl_small clob; cl_big clob; cl_big2 clob; begin v2 := rpad('x',cl_small); dbms_output.put_line('cl_big[2]:' || length(cl_big2)); cl_big2 := replace_with_clob(cl_big,cl_big); dbms_output.put_line('cl_big[3]:' || length(cl_big2)); end; / v2:32767 cl_small:32767 cl_big[1]:65535 cl_big[2]:98301 cl_big[3]:131069