有这样的电话
some_proc(sysdate,sysdate); select some_func(sysdate,sysdate) from dual
我想知道两个sysdate调用是否有可能给出不同的值? sysdate是否仅因执行速度而改变?
some_proc(sysdate,sysdate); – 在PL / sql语句中使用时,sysdate不会始终相同
原文链接:https://www.f2er.com/oracle/205274.html从dual中选择some_func(sysdate,sysdate); – 在sql语句中使用时,sysdate将始终相同(即使该sql语句正在调用PL / sql)
从概念指南的Statement-Level Read Consistency部分:“Oracle始终强制执行语句级读取一致性.这可以保证单个查询返回的所有数据都来自单个时间点 – 查询开始的时间.”
我们可以通过创建一个接受许多时间戳参数的大型函数(sql上下文)和过程(PL / sql上下文)来证明这一点,然后比较任何差异的输入参数.我使用时间戳而不是日期,因为它们在一致性方面应该以相同的方式工作,但时间戳(9)比日期更可能改变十亿倍. (粗略地说 – 可能有很多舍入和内部时钟细节,我不知道这使得这更复杂.)
--First,use functions like these to create long strings of variables. --PL/sql can go to 64K parameters,but luckily differences appear much sooner. --Parameters for function and procedure select listagg('a'||level||' timestamp',',') within group(order by level) from dual connect by level <= 100 order by level; --Columns for least/greatest select listagg('a'||level,') within group(order by level) from dual connect by level <= 100; --Systimestamps for select/exec select listagg('systimestamp',') within group(order by 1) from dual connect by level <= 100; --FUNCTION - sql context create or replace function function_test( a1 timestamp,a2 timestamp,a3 timestamp,a4 timestamp,a5 timestamp,a6 timestamp,a7 timestamp,a8 timestamp,a9 timestamp,a10 timestamp,a11 timestamp,a12 timestamp,a13 timestamp,a14 timestamp,a15 timestamp,a16 timestamp,a17 timestamp,a18 timestamp,a19 timestamp,a20 timestamp,a21 timestamp,a22 timestamp,a23 timestamp,a24 timestamp,a25 timestamp,a26 timestamp,a27 timestamp,a28 timestamp,a29 timestamp,a30 timestamp,a31 timestamp,a32 timestamp,a33 timestamp,a34 timestamp,a35 timestamp,a36 timestamp,a37 timestamp,a38 timestamp,a39 timestamp,a40 timestamp,a41 timestamp,a42 timestamp,a43 timestamp,a44 timestamp,a45 timestamp,a46 timestamp,a47 timestamp,a48 timestamp,a49 timestamp,a50 timestamp,a51 timestamp,a52 timestamp,a53 timestamp,a54 timestamp,a55 timestamp,a56 timestamp,a57 timestamp,a58 timestamp,a59 timestamp,a60 timestamp,a61 timestamp,a62 timestamp,a63 timestamp,a64 timestamp,a65 timestamp,a66 timestamp,a67 timestamp,a68 timestamp,a69 timestamp,a70 timestamp,a71 timestamp,a72 timestamp,a73 timestamp,a74 timestamp,a75 timestamp,a76 timestamp,a77 timestamp,a78 timestamp,a79 timestamp,a80 timestamp,a81 timestamp,a82 timestamp,a83 timestamp,a84 timestamp,a85 timestamp,a86 timestamp,a87 timestamp,a88 timestamp,a89 timestamp,a90 timestamp,a91 timestamp,a92 timestamp,a93 timestamp,a94 timestamp,a95 timestamp,a96 timestamp,a97 timestamp,a98 timestamp,a99 timestamp,a100 timestamp ) return varchar2 is v_min timestamp(9); v_max timestamp(9); begin v_min := least(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6,a7,a8,a9,a10,a11,a12,a13,a14,a15,a16,a17,a18,a19,a20,a21,a22,a23,a24,a25,a26,a27,a28,a29,a30,a31,a32,a33,a34,a35,a36,a37,a38,a39,a40,a41,a42,a43,a44,a45,a46,a47,a48,a49,a50,a51,a52,a53,a54,a55,a56,a57,a58,a59,a60,a61,a62,a63,a64,a65,a66,a67,a68,a69,a70,a71,a72,a73,a74,a75,a76,a77,a78,a79,a80,a81,a82,a83,a84,a85,a86,a87,a88,a89,a90,a91,a92,a93,a94,a95,a96,a97,a98,a99,a100 ); v_max := greatest(a1,a100 ); if v_min <> v_max then return 'different'; else return 'the same'; end if; end; / --No matter how many times you run this,you'll always get "the same". select function_test(systimestamp,systimestamp,systimestamp) from dual; --PROCEDURE - PL/sql context set serveroutput on; create or replace procedure procedure_test( a1 timestamp,a100 timestamp ) is v_min timestamp(9); v_max timestamp(9); begin v_min := least(a1,a100 ); if v_min <> v_max then dbms_output.put_line('different'); else dbms_output.put_line('the same'); end if; end; / --I see "different" about 50% of the time. --The ratio of differences decreases as you decrease the number of parameters. exec procedure_test(systimestamp,systimestamp);