任何人都可以理解和解释Docker和Rocket的根本区别?
我似乎没有得到它.
也许这只是一个新方向.
希望有人能解释Docker vs Rocket的根本利弊.
谢谢
https://coreos.com/blog/rocket/
https://github.com/coreos/rocket
CoreOS以及others开放源代码开发商和初创公司都表示,Docker打破了“标准容器”的概念,简洁性和可组合性,而started from则由removed original shipping containers ‘manifesto’证实.
在我身边,我已经看到许多信号,从Docker品牌的“法律授权”开始,到LXC containers年底,Docker基地的Linux开源技术从一开始就允许自己爬升.对我们第一个热烈的反应here,反映了所有Solo Hyakes(Docker项目的创始人和创始人)对CoreOS公告的“反击”.
那就是为什么我最近好奇(好笑地)最近宣布的所罗门铉:“We’re standing on the shoulders of giants”
他们也提出了对安全性和组合性观点的怀疑:
From a security and composability perspective,the Docker process
@H_404_35@
model – where everything runs through a central daemon – is
fundamentally flawed. To “fix” Docker would essentially mean a rewrite
of the project,while inheriting all the baggage of the existing
implementation.那么火箭在最后呢?
Rocket is an alternative to the Docker runtime,designed for server
@H_404_35@
environments with the most rigorous security and production
requirements. Rocket is oriented around the App Container
specification,a new set of simple and open specifications for a
portable container format.Docker有什么区别?
promise foundation of freedom and industrial open standards喜欢在DNS,HTTP,IMAP,SMTP,TCP / IP,ISO / OSI堆栈…互联网?或者更具体的安全性和可组合性.
看看折衷演讲者和惊人的developer凯尔西Hightower Rocket Tutorial & Demo.
正在进行的更新(SPECs – OPENSOURCE – VISION):
[MUST READ] Amazing nitty-gritty details about the matter of Docker flawed
universal toolkit for emulating Heroku,regardless of stack or container engine