‘const float’值不同于’float’当转换为’int’在C#

前端之家收集整理的这篇文章主要介绍了‘const float’值不同于’float’当转换为’int’在C#前端之家小编觉得挺不错的,现在分享给大家,也给大家做个参考。
你能解释为什么会发生这种情况吗?
static void Main()
{
    const float xScaleStart = 0.5f;
    const float xScaleStop = 4.0f;
    const float xScaleInterval = 0.1f;
    const float xScaleAmplitude = xScaleStop - xScaleStart;

    const float xScaleSizeC = xScaleAmplitude / xScaleInterval;

    float xScaleSize = xScaleAmplitude / xScaleInterval;

    Console.WriteLine(">const float {0},(int){1}",xScaleSizeC,(int)xScaleSizeC);

    Console.WriteLine(">      float {0},xScaleSize,(int)xScaleSize);

    Console.ReadLine();
}

输出

>const float 35,(int)34
>      float 35,(int)35

我知道0.1的二进制表示实际上是0.09999990463256835937,虽然为什么会发生使用’const float’而不是’float’?这是否被认为是编译器错误

对于记录,代码编译成:

private static void Main(string[] args)
{
    float xScaleSize = 35f;
    Console.WriteLine(">const float {0},35f,34);
    Console.WriteLine(">      float {0},(int)xScaleSize);
    Console.ReadLine();
}

解决方法

“为什么”这基本上归结为这样的事实,即使用浮点数据时,可以使用具有比为float或double指定的精度更高的精度的内部表示。这在虚拟执行系统(VES)规范( Partition I第12节)中明确规定:

floating-point numbers are represented using an internal floating-point
type. In each such instance,the nominal type of the variable or expression is either float32 or float64,but its
value can be represented internally with additional range and/or precision

@H_404_27@

然后,我们有:

The use of an internal representation that is wider than float32 or float64 can cause differences in
computational results when a developer makes seemingly unrelated modifications to their code,the result of
which can be that a value is spilled from the internal representation (e.g.,in a register) to a location on the
stack.

@H_404_27@

现在,根据C# language specification

The compile-time evaluation of constant expressions uses the same rules as run-time evaluation of non-constant expressions,except that where run-time evaluation would have thrown an exception,compile-time evaluation causes a compile-time error to occur.

@H_404_27@

但是如上所述,规则实际上允许更多的精度被有时使用,并且当使用这种增强的精度时,实际上不是在我们的直接控制下。

显然,在不同的情况下,结果可能恰恰与您观察到的结果相反 – 编译器可能已经降低了精度,而运行时可以保持更高的精度。

原文链接:https://www.f2er.com/css/221940.html

猜你在找的CSS相关文章