( qi::_bool >> qi::_bool >> qi::_bool >> qi::_bool) [px::bind(&Bool4Function,spirit::_val,spirit::_1,spirit::_2,spirit::_3,spirit::_4)]
虽然它是自己的,但是使用它就是简单的丑陋和混乱,即使使用命名空间的部分.
这就是为什么我想把这个表达式提取成一个独立的语法.
所以我试过这个(信用到ildjarn为测试台):
///// grammar implementation ///// #include <boost/fusion/include/vector10.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_bool.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_char_.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_grammar.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_operator.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_rule.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_string.hpp> struct FourBools : boost::spirit::qi::grammar< char const*,boost::fusion::vector4<bool,bool,bool>() > { typedef boost::fusion::vector4<bool,bool> attribute_type; FourBools() : base_type(start_) { using boost::spirit::bool_; start_ = "4bools:" >> bool_ >> ',' >> bool_ >> ',' >> bool_ >> ';' ; } private: boost::spirit::qi::rule< base_type::iterator_type,base_type::sig_type > start_; }; FourBools const fourBools; ///// demonstration of use ///// #include <string> #include <ios> #include <iostream> #include <boost/fusion/include/at_c.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_bind.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_core.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_action.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_parse.hpp> void noDice(bool a,bool b,bool c,bool d) { } void worksFine(boost::fusion::vector4<bool,bool> a) { } int main() { namespace phx = boost::phoenix; namespace spirit = boost::spirit; std::string const input("4bools:true,true,false;"); char const* first = input.c_str(); char const* const last = first + input.size(); bool const success = spirit::qi::parse( first,last,fourBools[phx::bind(&noDice,spirit::_1)] ); if (!success) std::cout << "parse() Failed\n"; else if (first != last) std::cout << "didn't consume all input\n"; std::cout.flush(); }
除非使用fourBools [phx :: bind(& worksFine,spirit :: _ 1)]替换fourBools [phx :: bind(& noDice,spirit :: _ 1)],否则不会编译.
这意味着我的问题是解开匹配要调用的函数的签名的参数,因为参数的数量在签名级别是不同的(一个是四个bool的元组,也可以是四个bool).
是否可以直接使用凤凰占位符进行打包,而不是写入包装器,将元组转换为需要单独的现有功能的单独参数?
如果是,那么语法是什么呢?
毕竟,一个内联版本(qi :: _ bool>> qi :: _ bool>> qi :: _ bool>> qi :: _ bool)在精神上“解压缩”时工作正常:: _ 1 – 精神:: _ 4,占位符.
这使我看起来好像这个版本还返回一个元组,并且与上面的方法有些不兼容,不像返回一个的语法.
我该如何处理?
解决方法
这是一个工作示范希望您可以使用它作为参考,以弄清楚您的代码有什么问题:
///// grammar implementation ///// #include <boost/fusion/include/vector10.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_bool.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_char_.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_grammar.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_operator.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_rule.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_string.hpp> struct FourBools : boost::spirit::qi::grammar< char const*,bool> attribute_type; FourBools() : base_type(start_) { using boost::spirit::bool_; start_ = "4bools:" >> bool_ >> ',' >> bool_ >> ',' >> bool_ >> ';' ; } private: boost::spirit::qi::rule< base_type::iterator_type,base_type::sig_type > start_; }; FourBools const fourBools; ///// demonstration of use ///// #include <string> #include <ios> #include <iostream> #include <boost/fusion/include/at_c.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_bind.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_core.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_action.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_parse.hpp> typedef FourBools::attribute_type attr_t; struct verify_same { explicit verify_same(attr_t const& expected) : expected_(expected) { } void verify(attr_t const& actual) const { using boost::fusion::at_c; std::cout << std::boolalpha << "same as expected: " << (actual == expected_) << "\nactual values: " << at_c<0>(actual) << ' ' << at_c<1>(actual) << ' ' << at_c<2>(actual) << ' ' << at_c<3>(actual) << '\n'; } private: attr_t expected_; }; int main() { namespace phx = boost::phoenix; namespace spirit = boost::spirit; std::string const input("4bools:true,false;"); verify_same const vs(attr_t(true,false)); char const* first = input.c_str(); char const* const last = first + input.size(); bool const success = spirit::qi::parse( first,fourBools[phx::bind(&verify_same::verify,phx::cref(vs),spirit::_1)] ); if (!success) std::cout << "parse() Failed\n"; else if (first != last) std::cout << "didn't consume all input\n"; std::cout.flush(); }
除此之外,我认为使用纯均匀类型的元组是奇怪的;个人来说,我会将语法的合成属性更改为boost :: array< bool,4>.
编辑(响应OP的编辑):有好消息和坏消息,更好的消息.
这是一个好消息:Boost.Fusion具有使用最少代码完成所需功能的功能:boost::fusion::fused<>
.这将需要一个可调用类型(包括自由功能指针和成员函数指针),它可以接受多个参数并将该可调用类型包装一个融合序列的函子;当调用该函子时,它需要Fusion序列并解包它,将元组的各个元素转发到包装的可调用类型作为单独的参数.
所以,考虑到我已经发布的语法和以下内容:
#include <string> #include <ios> #include <iostream> #include <boost/fusion/include/at_c.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/make_fused.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_bind.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_core.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_fusion.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_action.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi_parse.hpp> typedef FourBools::attribute_type attr_t; void free_func_taking_tuple(attr_t const& tup) { using boost::fusion::at_c; std::cout << std::boolalpha << "inside free_func_taking_tuple() :: " << at_c<0>(tup) << ' ' << at_c<1>(tup) << ' ' << at_c<2>(tup) << ' ' << at_c<3>(tup) << '\n'; } void free_func_taking_bools( bool const a,bool const b,bool const c,bool const d ) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << "inside free_func_taking_bools() :: " << a << ' ' << b << ' ' << c << ' ' << d << '\n'; }
boost :: spirit :: qi :: parse()可以这样调用:
namespace phx = boost::phoenix; namespace spirit = boost::spirit; using boost::fusion::make_fused; // calls free_func_taking_tuple,nothing new here spirit::qi::parse( first,fourBools[phx::bind(free_func_taking_tuple,spirit::_1)] ); // calls free_func_taking_bools,using boost::fusion::fused<> to unpack the tuple // into separate arguments spirit::qi::parse( first,fourBools[phx::bind(make_fused(&free_func_taking_bools),spirit::_1)] );
这是一个坏消息:Boost.Fusion的可调用类型包装器依赖于TR1 / C 11 result_of协议,而Boost.Phoenix v2实现了Boost.Lambda result_of协议 – 这些不兼容.因此,您必须自己解压元组元素:
namespace phx = boost::phoenix; namespace spirit = boost::spirit; spirit::qi::parse( first,fourBools[phx::bind( free_func_taking_bools,phx::at_c<0>(spirit::_1),phx::at_c<1>(spirit::_1),phx::at_c<2>(spirit::_1),phx::at_c<3>(spirit::_1) )] );
呸!但是,还有一个好消息:Boost.Phoenix v3将在Boost 1.47中发布,它实现了TR1 / C11的result_of协议.因此,从Boost 1.47开始,您将可以使用boost :: fusion :: fused&并节省自己一些繁琐的样板.