在MS C vs Clang中移动语义

在使用我创建的数组类型对移动语义进行一些实验之后,我想知道为什么Microsoft的C编译器在从一个方法返回值时调用移动构造函数,而Clang编译器将副本全部放在一起？

这是Clang的正确或错误行为吗？或正确的微软行为？

#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>

template<typename T>
class Array {
    public:
    template<typename E>
    class ArrayIterator {
        public:
        ArrayIterator(Array<E>& elements,int index) : position_(index),elements_(elements) {
        }

        T& operator * () {
            return elements_[position_];
        }

        ArrayIterator& operator++ () {
            position_++;
            return *this;
        }

        ArrayIterator operator++ (int) {
            return ArrayIterator(elements_,++position_);
        }

        bool operator != (ArrayIterator const & other) {
            return position_ != other.position_;
        }

        private:
        int position_;
        Array<E>& elements_;
    };
    typedef ArrayIterator<T> iterator;
    Array();
    explicit Array(int size);
    ~Array();
    Array(const Array& other);
    Array(Array&& other);
    Array<T>& operator = (Array other);
    T& operator[](int index);
    int size() const;
    iterator begin();
    iterator end();


    private:
    void internal_swap(Array& other);
    T *elements_;
    int length_;
};

template<typename T>
Array<T>::Array() {
    length_ = 0;
    elements_ = 0;
}

template<typename T>
Array<T>::Array(int size) {
    elements_ = new T[size];
    length_ = size;
}

template<typename T>
Array<T>::~Array() {
    delete[] elements_;
    std::cout << "Destroy...." << std::endl;
}

template<typename T>
Array<T>::Array(const Array<T>& other) { 
    std::cout << "copy ctor" << std::endl;

    length_ = other.size();

    T *elements = new T[size()];
    std::copy(other.elements_,other.elements_ + other.size(),elements);

    elements_ = elements;
}

template<typename T>
Array<T>::Array(Array<T>&& other) { 
    std::cout << "move ctor" << std::endl;
    length_ = other.size();
    T* oelements = other.elements_;
    other.elements_ = 0;
    this->elements_ = oelements;

}

template<typename T>
Array<T>& Array<T>::operator = (Array other) {
    internal_swap(other);
    return *this;
}

template<typename T>
T& Array<T>::operator[](int index) {
    return elements_[index];
}

template<typename T>
int Array<T>::size() const {
    return length_;
}

template<typename T>
typename Array<T>::iterator Array<T>::begin() {
    return iterator(*this,0);
}

template<typename T>
typename Array<T>::iterator Array<T>::end() {
    return iterator(*this,size());
};

template<typename T>
void Array<T>::internal_swap(Array& other){
    T* oelements = other.elements_;
    other.elements_ = this->elements_;
    this->elements_ = oelements;
}

Array<int> get_values(int x);

int main(int argc,const char *argv[]) {

    Array<int> a = get_values(2);

    for (Array<int>::iterator i = a.begin(); i != a.end(); ++i) {
        std::cout << *i << std::endl;
    }

    return 0;
}

Array<int> get_values(int x) { 
    Array<int> a(10);


    if(x == 1) return a;


    for (int i = 0; i <= 9; i++) {
        a[i] = 1 + i;
    }

    return a;
}

解决方法

复制省略是一种罕见的优化,其中标准允许不同的可观察行为(它不属于as-if规则),但不是未定义的行为.

是否在此上下文中调用或删除了任何复制或移动构造函数是未指定的,并且不同的编译器可以表现不同并且都是正确的.

原文链接：https://www.f2er.com/c/110335.html

在MS C vs Clang中移动语义

解决方法

猜你在找的C&C++相关文章